This Dataset, "Replication Data for: The acquisition of the English dative alternation by Russian Foreign Language Learners" (hereafter: Dataset), may be reused according to the CLARIN PUB+BY+LRT license as described below:
Copyright holders: Ludovic De Cuypere, Evelyn De Coster, Kristof Baten
Resource: Replication Data for: The acquisition of the English dative alternation by Russian Foreign Language Learners
The Copyright holders grant the End-User a free, non-exclusive and perpetual (for the duration of the copyright) right to use and make copies of the Resource, distribute copies and present the Resource in public as such, as modified, or as part of a compilation or derived work. The permission applies to all known or future modes and means of communication and includes a right to make modifications enabling the use of the Resource on other devices and in other formats.
Additional license terms as defined in the Condition Definitions section below:
- General Use conditions: BY, LRT
Condition Definitions:
- BY: Attribution, i.e. acknowledgement of authorship, is required.
- LRT: The content is available only for language research and technology development.
This license has been made in compliance with copyright agreements by WIPO – the World Intellectual Property Organization. The rights granted in this license shall be so interpreted that in case applicable intellectual property laws grant rights not mentioned in this license, they are also regarded as part of the rights to be licensed; the purpose of this license is not to restrict any rights intended to be licensed within different legal systems. Additional rights to the Resource may be agreed separately in writing.
Reused sources:
This Dataset contains examples of usage from the British National Corpus (http://www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk/) (BNC:), used under the BNC User Licence (cf. http://www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk/docs/licence.html), which among other things states the following:
- "The BNC Consortium hereby grants according to the terms and conditions set out herein and in consideration of the payments specified herein a non-exclusive, non-transferable Licence to the Licensee to use the BNC Processed Material for the purposes of linguistic research and/or the development of language products".
- "There is no restriction on the use of the Licensee's Results except that the Licensee may not publish in print or electronic form or exploit commercially in any form whatsoever any extracts from the BNC Processed Material other than those permitted under the fair dealings provision of copyright law."
This Dataset contains 26 sentences / parts of sentences extracted from BNC. These (parts of) sentences are extracted from different texts and do thus not contain any coherent larger parts of any single text. Therefore, publishing these examples of usage in the Dataset is considered to be permitted under the fair dealings provision of copyright law; see details in section Fair dealing below.
Fair dealing:
According to UK Copyright Law (cf. https://www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright#fair-dealing), “[f]actors that have been identified by the courts as relevant in determining whether a particular dealing with a work is fair include:
- "does using the work affect the market for the original work? If a use of a work acts as a substitute for it, causing the owner to lose revenue, then it is not likely to be fair"
- "is the amount of the work taken reasonable and appropriate? Was it necessary to use the amount that was taken? Usually only part of a work may be used”
The corpus extracts used in this Dataset may be said to represent fair dealing according to both of these factors:
- The extracted material does not affect the market for the original work, as it is unlikely that any researcher would refrain from using the corpus or the original works which the corpus is based on because of the availability of the extracted material contained in this Dataset.
- The amount of the extracted work is reasonable and appropriate as it was necessary to carry out the study, and as it is necessary to replicate the study. Therefore, publishing these examples of usage is not considered to infringe the copyright of the original IPR holders.